Open Innovation, Done Right: Lessons from Our Work with a Mental Health Clinic and the University of St. Gallen
Open Innovation is often a mess. It’s vague. It’s performative. And more often than not, it ends with an idea board and zero follow-through. We’ve seen it fail. And that’s exactly why we do it differently. In this case, we worked with ZADZ AG - a leading mental health clinic and part of a family-owned group in Switzerland - and the University of St. Gallen (HSG) to run focused sprints that delivered insight, alignment, and forward motion.
Most Open Innovation Fails for Three Reasons
- No real question - just “let’s do something with students or startups.”
- No internal bridge - the insights stay outside, and nothing changes.
- No next step - no plan to translate what was learned into what gets built.
The Context: Why ZADZ Needed New Ideas
ZADZ was exploring how to grow beyond their core revenue model - ambulatory mental health services reimbursed by TARMED. They weren’t trying to build a new business unit (yet). They wanted to explore:
- What next-gen customers expect from therapy
- Whether parallel revenue models (e.g. sleep medicine) could be viable
- How to move toward innovation without breaking what works
What We Did
Together with HSG, we launched two open innovation sprints designed to answer real questions.
[ Sprint 1 - Gen Z Therapy ]
What do younger audiences expect from mental healthcare?
- HSG students interviewed Gen Z, analyzed expectations, and mapped digital-first therapy concepts
- Deliverables included customer personas, service models, and design principles
- Outcome: Internal clarity for ZADZ and input for positioning and employer branding
[ Sprint 2 - Sleep Medicine ]
Could a sleep-focused outpatient service become a parallel revenue stream?
- Teams explored trends, pain points, and viable business models
- Outcome: A strategic option that made it to board-level discussion
Each sprint ran over approximately 6 weeks, with weekly check-ins, defined outputs, and embedded leadership participation.
What Made It Work
- Tight framing - every sprint started with a strategic question
- Embedded leadership - ZADZ leadership was present and involved
- Outcome-driven - the goal wasn’t ideas, it was clarity
- Academic firepower - partnering with HSG added depth and credibility
This wasn’t innovation theatre. It was structured learning for real-world decisions.
The Strategic Win
For ZADZ, the biggest win wasn’t a new product - it was the ability to test future directions without slowing down core operations. Each sprint built:
- Strategic insight
- Internal alignment
- Confidence to act (or pause) based on evidence
For us, it proved that even in regulated environments, you can run fast, useful experiments - if you design them right.
What You Can Steal from This
If you’re running a business with legacy systems, here’s the model:
- One sharp question
- One committed partner
- One tight sprint
We’ve used this model across clinics, B2B services, and family-run companies. It works - even in places where change is hard.