Case Study
Open Innovation
11.07.2025

Open Innovation, Done Right: Lessons from Our Work with a Mental Health Clinic and the University of St. Gallen

Open Innovation is often a mess. It’s vague. It’s performative. And more often than not, it ends with an idea board and zero follow-through. We’ve seen it fail. And that’s exactly why we do it differently. In this case, we worked with ZADZ AG - a leading mental health clinic and part of a family-owned group in Switzerland - and the University of St. Gallen (HSG) to run focused sprints that delivered insight, alignment, and forward motion.

Most Open Innovation Fails for Three Reasons

  1. No real question - just “let’s do something with students or startups.”
  2. No internal bridge - the insights stay outside, and nothing changes.
  3. No next step - no plan to translate what was learned into what gets built.

The Context: Why ZADZ Needed New Ideas

ZADZ was exploring how to grow beyond their core revenue model - ambulatory mental health services reimbursed by TARMED. They weren’t trying to build a new business unit (yet). They wanted to explore:

  • What next-gen customers expect from therapy
  • Whether parallel revenue models (e.g. sleep medicine) could be viable
  • How to move toward innovation without breaking what works

What We Did

Together with HSG, we launched two open innovation sprints designed to answer real questions.

[ Sprint 1 - Gen Z Therapy ]

What do younger audiences expect from mental healthcare?

  • HSG students interviewed Gen Z, analyzed expectations, and mapped digital-first therapy concepts
  • Deliverables included customer personas, service models, and design principles
  • Outcome: Internal clarity for ZADZ and input for positioning and employer branding

[ Sprint 2 - Sleep Medicine ]

Could a sleep-focused outpatient service become a parallel revenue stream?

  • Teams explored trends, pain points, and viable business models
  • Outcome: A strategic option that made it to board-level discussion

Each sprint ran over approximately 6 weeks, with weekly check-ins, defined outputs, and embedded leadership participation.

What Made It Work

  • Tight framing - every sprint started with a strategic question
  • Embedded leadership - ZADZ leadership was present and involved
  • Outcome-driven - the goal wasn’t ideas, it was clarity
  • Academic firepower - partnering with HSG added depth and credibility

This wasn’t innovation theatre. It was structured learning for real-world decisions.

The Strategic Win

For ZADZ, the biggest win wasn’t a new product - it was the ability to test future directions without slowing down core operations. Each sprint built:

  • Strategic insight
  • Internal alignment
  • Confidence to act (or pause) based on evidence

For us, it proved that even in regulated environments, you can run fast, useful experiments - if you design them right.

What You Can Steal from This

If you’re running a business with legacy systems, here’s the model:

  • One sharp question
  • One committed partner
  • One tight sprint

We’ve used this model across clinics, B2B services, and family-run companies. It works - even in places where change is hard.

Subscribe to the Newsletter